THIS BOOK IS FREE TO DOWNLOAD AND READ…IT’S FROM ROBERT KENNEDY AND CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE SO VERY WELL RESEARCHED, BULLET-PROOF, AND VERY RELIABLE INFORMATION. A VERY CREDIBLE POST-MORTEM ON COVID ET AL – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ebook-sign-up/ebook-sign-up-a-letter-to-liberals/
There was a time when American’s firmly believed “The Science” and smoking was “good for you.” Why did they believe that? Tobacco companies commissioned scientific studies and published official-looking information that was misleading at best. They showed doctors smoking and recommending it for others. How could we be fooled by that?
When people around us are dying of cancer, how could we ignore the obvious signs and believe the propaganda?
Cigarette manufacturers were a lot smarter than us. They studied us and how we made decisions and how we could be influenced. They learned how to “program” us to believe something. And it worked because we believed it.
Part of the magic was giving tobacco a place on our TV. Tobacco executives knew the public has to inhale to get hooked.
It took decades before we could hear the voices of the actual scientists and researchers screaming, “This stuff is killing you!”
Up until that time, cigarettes were “Safe and Effective” – everyone said so – TV announcers, movie stars, and store owners.
And the families of executives working in the tobacco industry enjoyed a great lifestyle – big homes, new cars, vacations, great food, servants, and community status. Their children felt special and few ever realized their lifestyle was founded on the deaths of millions.
Did American corporations abandon looking for profit by deceiving consumers? After tobacco did they see the error of their ways and go straight? More likely they got better. Each generation taking lessons from the last, they improved their techniques – better control of science, the media, and their consumers.
The corporate playbook improved for Pharmaceuticals.
CONTROL SCIENCE – they had to become the funding source for all grants and make certain colleges and universities could get patents and revenue streams from inventions – this occurred in 1980 with the Bayh-Dole Act. Once all the money came from your industry, you could fund studies that made your product look good and decline to fund things that didn’t. And if a university team at Harvard was working on something that made you look bad, you threatened to defund them and ban them from publishing and presenting at conferences. In order to control science it became apparent you had to corrupt and own the scientific journals so that only papers you liked could get peer-reviewed and published. Science became a “narrative” – a scenario put together by the industry and it’s owners – after all, everything was eventually owned by Black Rock and Vanguard so they set the priorities and industry marching orders. No one had to look very far into history to see that one family created the medical schools and made the drugs that doctors learned to prescribe. Drugs made from fossil fuels.
CONTROL MEDIA – one of the most troublesome issues about getting your product accepted was the pesky media – always able to investigate, and write news stories that didn’t agree with the narrative you were pushing. But once the industry becomes the major payer for advertising for any network or media channel, problem solved. It’s a very short distance from there to putting out “talking points” to every media channel so that people can hear the same message repeated multiple times by every major channel – “it must be true because everyone is saying it.” Now if you allow the industry to advertise their products and take up 50%+ of commercial air time, you have essentially captured not only the media but all the available attention from the consumer. In 1969, the FDA was given the “keys to this car” and promptly set out guidelines for Direct to Consumer Product Advertising which made the U.S. one of the only two countries in the world (New Zealand is the other) to allow direct access to consumers. The possibly unanticipated consequences – the Pharmaceutical companies quickly seized market share on all major channels and became the de-facto “owners” of these stations by virtue of their revenue streams. They now dictate what these media channels can air and pass down talking points on important issues to each channel.
CONTROL INVESTMENT
The ideal setup would be to own a few government agencies who on the surface would appear to be responsible for regulating your industry. Then have those agencies make policy affecting everyone in the country – “mandates” of products and policies to have everyone in the country take that product. In addition, the key banks and investment firms would selectively invest for projects that favored the industry and its patents. In fact, the government agencies themselves could own patents and selectively grant those patents created in universities to companies who would in turn share revenue with the agencies. Controlling investment sources would carve out the shape of the industry and control it at the same time.
CONTROL LAWMAKING
Of course, in democratic countries you would have to address those pesky congress men and women who believed they control the country and its corporations. But congress is full of people who make $200K but would like to make $2M so enabling the country to treat corporations as the same as an individual citizen would then allow corporations to donate and lobby congress people understanding that corporations have an infinitely higher threshold for paying off actions than most individual donors. How many times would that congress person face decisions between the best interests of the public and the best interests of those giving them $2M a year and their lifestyle and kids education? In 2010, the Supreme Court made its decision on a case Citizen’s United vs. the Federal Election Commission. Big money had always had an outsized influence on political figures, but once a corporation or other such entity gained the same rights to fund elections as a private citizen, the amount of money flowing into politics went ballistic and the average American voice become too low in volume to hear.
So let’s apply these lessons learned to the area of pharmaceuticals. But first let’s do a comprehensive review of the real science – those findings that have been mostly obscured but are highly supported by world wide scientific consensus.
PANDEMIC
America and the world have had Pandemics before and we have rushed to market with emergency vaccines before. In fact, we’ve had plenty of practice and developed a comprehensive and almost fool-proof plan having had a variety of failures. In past Pandemics we’ve “cried wolf” only to discover that predictions of global infection were exaggerated and we’ve introduced vaccines that killed or maimed people so quickly that we’ve had to remove them from the market entirely.
In fact, the current Pandemic is the result of many lessons learned. Having implemented all the above lessons learned, the progenitors of the Pandemic only had to faithfully execute the plan. The four main legs of the Pandemic Stool had been put in place over decades – CONTROL SCIENCE, CONTROL MEDIA, CONTROL INVESTMENT, CONTROL LAWMAKING.
All that would be needed is an escaped virus that was highly contagious and a group of world leaders ready to fall into the trap.
Event 201 used a technology well-known to corporations called “Scenario Planning.” Through a simulation exercise of a Corona Virus Pandemic, the event taught the leaders their available options and allowed them to try each one and observe the simulated outcomes. This method allows the introduction of untried and unproven strategies in an environment that suspends critical thinking. Things like lockdowns of the healthy which have never been used to fight a pandemic, the imprisonment of the healthy and well population instead of the sick, would be tried and imagined outcomes would be presented as if real and reasonable. The same with masks and vaccines. The idea of vaccinating the population in the middle of a pandemic would never pass with most scientists but the leaders in the room would adopt the strategy and be told what the positive outcomes were without discussing the risks. Shell Oil credits Scenario Planning with helping them respond to the oil crisis and by pre-practicing their response, have a leadership team ready to respond quickly and effectively as a competitive edge over other oil companies.
The characteristic of Scenario Planning is the ability to practice and pre-plan a response to an imagined scenario. The strategies and outcomes built into the scenarios and responses are generally widely tested and studied responses that are best among many options with calibrated outcomes. The participants have no way to evaluate and judge any strategic option or outcome and the results are built into the algorithms of each scenario so beyond reproach.
Using the Scenario Planning approach allows the leaders to introduce options like face masks, lockdowns, quarantines, travel bans, and vaccines without critical thinking or valid science. Essentially, for the unscrupulous leader, it represents a way to get world leaders to practice using global health measures you should never use.
MASKS
Even in operating rooms in hospitals, N95 masks have long been proven ineffective. Doctors still wear them as a tradition but they are unnecessary. When real protection is needed against viral agents, a pressurized “bunny suit” is used to completely isolate the doctor from the patient and the room.
Cloth masks and commercial and retail masks are completely ineffective with the Corona Virus. And in fact, they are extremely harmful according to OSHA and other scientists who have tested CO2 and O2 levels and pronounced them dangerous and ill-advised for more than 30 minutes of use. Add the recirculation of pathogens and you clearly cause an order of magnitude of harm before addressing the well-studied and established psychological issues.
Lowering O2 levels and raising CO2 levels disables the immune system and makes the person wearing the mask more susceptible to infection.
LOCKDOWN
There is no history for locking down a population to prevent any disease. There is history for locking down or isolating those who are sick or infected. There are no scientific studies supporting lockdowns as a method to slow spread. There are scientific statistical studies that show lockdowns have no effect on the bottom line – deaths per million lives.
In the case of COVID-19, it has been proven that lockdowns have had no significant effect on spread of the illness. It can temporarily slow the spread but when comparing countries who have used lockdowns against those who have not, there is no significant advantage between countries in terms of deaths per million lives.
Meanwhile, according to Dr. Zach Bush, the virus can spread via transcontinental air currents which brings into question the wisdom of shutting down flights and countries altogether.
SHOCK AND AWE
When the CDC changed the definition and procedures for recording cause of death they set the stage for a campaign designed to create fear and panic among the population. By the same token, the use of the PCR test at Cycle-Times (“CT”) over 20, was designed to produce escalating case counts to further emphasize the supposed danger of the virus.
Now many doctors objected to recording cause of death “COD” as COVID, but Minnesota Senator Dr. Scott Jensen was one of those whose medical license came under review for his public comments. Many doctors lost their licenses for speaking out against the COD issue but also for any dissenting comments against vaccines or COVID policies. Still in spite of widespread objection to the policy changes, the financial incentives for hospitals kept them largely quiet and therefore the numbers of COVID deaths were highly inflated and many highly published and accomplished scientists published studies that showed the infection fatality ratio “IFR” (how many actually die after infection) to be comparable to a seasonal influenza except in the case of people over 65. Inflating the death rate was clearly a strategy designed to support the “Shock and Awe” campaign required by the planners of the Pandemic.
The inventor of the PCR test (Kary Mullis) said it was not useful or fit for use to support virus testing of any kind. He went on record as stating the test would indicate a wide range of findings of the presence of a virus or virus particle dead or alive. Because the test uses a succession of cycles to amplify the test sample, it can find an indication of a variety of viral particles both alive and dead. The use of this test with high cycle counts insured that a large portion of the population would show a positive result as testing proceeded whether showing symptoms or not. The CDC made sure the cycle count specifications issued to labs was almost double the useful setting.
Why did the CDC have the power and authority to create these conditions? In the record of patents we find that years prior, the CDC had patented the Corona Virus along with all products and derivatives so that any testing, products, or procedures would have to be granted by them.
The Shock & Awe campaign of course required the control of the media to ensure that every channel would deliver the same “talking points” emphasizing the death rates and case rates. By keeping the population fearful and having plenty of visual cues to remind everyone of the danger (masks, lockdowns, signs on stores, etc.) the fear generated a higher degree of compliance which the CDC and FDA needed in order to force everyone in our country to get vaccinated.
As the vaccines are now in emergency use and fifty percent of the population has been vaccinated, the campaign has now turned to pitting the vaccinated population against the unvaccinated. The message is saying that the disease lives in the unvaccinated and they are killing our grandparents. People who admit to being unvaccinated are now being attacked on the street, in buildings, on elevators, in parks, and widespread violence against unvaccinated is becoming routine and clearly government-sponsored.
In New York and soon other states, they are moving to ban unvaccinated people from restaurants and stores. The authorities feel vaccination is important enough to threaten the ability to feed your children.
BRAIN WASHING
This is the idea that the human mind can be controlled and reprogrammed using psychological techniques. It is thought to be a long and arduous process involving torture and deprivation, including the breakdown of the personality. In fact, this explanation and common belief could not be further from the truth.
In fact, the programming of the human mind becomes very easy when that human is experiencing fear. The limbic system is activated by fear and the frontal cortex where we do most of our logical thinking is disabled. Max Major did an exercise on America’s Got Talent that demonstrated just how easy “Inception” (the infiltration of the subconscious to implant an idea) really was. Jason Christoff explains how easily the mechanism works.
So having control of the media so you can repeat the narrative over and over, and having the ability to instill fear, and pretty soon you have human beings reacting irrationally about those evil unvaccinated persons who have no reason to resist vaccination other than being uncaring and wanting to kill your parents.
Here is a list of beliefs that can be easily disproven but are in current use to program most of the population.
To illustrate how these beliefs work, let’s take just one of them and unpack the facts and motivations. We’ll take the last one…
Hydroxychloroquine “HCQ” has a 65-year history for treating Malaria and in many of the countries who use it across all cross-sections of the population, it has proven safe and effective against Malaria. It has been used in many countries as an “over-the-counter” medication to allow a large population to freely use it like aspirin or ibuprofen. Ivermectin has a similar 45-year history and track record for fighting parasites in a very safe and effective manner. Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize – one of only two ever awarded to a drug. They have been proven safe and effective for small children and pregnant women. And in fact, if you review countries worldwide for death rates from COVID, you’ll find that the countries with the lowest COVID death rates are those who use these drugs across the entire population.
And yet these drugs are banned. You might even realize that you cannot get an Emergency Use Authorization “EUA” from the FDA unless there are no alternatives for treating COVID. Therefore the vaccine makers cannot tolerate any current medication or drug existing that treats COVID because it would stop the use of a vaccine and stop the EUA authorization in the first place.
Thousands of doctors have been using these drugs along with other treatment protocols to treat patients with almost alarming success. Their primary goal has been to prevent hospital visits but depressing the symptoms of COVID and preventing COVID altogether are other benefits. In order to use these drugs you must prescribe them “off-label” which is to say your doctor plans to use them for a purpose other than the primary diagnosis which is Malaria. Doctors in private practice and even clinical settings prescribe off-label frequently and pharmacists just fill the prescription. Since COVID, doctors report that pharmacists are refusing to fill their prescriptions mainly due to corporate edicts in spite of the fact that the person’s own doctor is best suited to decide whether a particular medication should be used or not. Yet independent pharmacies still fill these prescriptions and millions of patients have been treated preventing them from going to a hospital or developing more serious symptoms. The “off-label” use of these drugs is already well-established for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.
If you believe at all today that these medications are dangerous and ineffective, it is not because it is true, but rather because you have been programmed to believe it is true. The WHO tried to conduct tests and publish a study on the safety issues of HCQ but it was withdrawn when it was established that the doses used in the study were lethal because they were two or three times the maximum safe dosage. This study killed volunteers.
And if you have any strong reactions to any of the other beliefs on the list above, you probably now recognize that the reason you react strongly to that belief is because you have it, you’re been programmed, and you don’t have even one book or scientific study to prove why you believe it.
It is possible that the techniques associated with brain washing have been in use for 1000s of years although they’ve become much easier since the introduction of radio and television. The U.S. is one of the very few countries in the world that allows pharmaceutical advertising and via the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, allows large corporations to act like citizens. Therefore, all the doors are open to programming the public to believe anything required.
Commercials for pharmaceuticals are designed to use the techniques of brainwashing so that you’ll believe a product is safe and effective even though you just heard 30 seconds of warnings about the side effects. Benefits are emphasized with pleasing visuals and exiting statements and images of people functioning normally while side effects are delivered in a monotone with no visuals. The benefits delivery programs the subconscious while the warnings of side effects do not.
The Congress of the United States, among all others countries, gave these companies the ability to program the population over television and the internet. Family doctors receive many of their patients for the sole purpose of prescribing a drug that the patient saw on TV and believes is safe and effective. Most patients get a prescription for these drugs without any knowledge of “informed consent” – the knowledge of how many people get side effects, and how many die. Patients rarely understand the extent of side effects until they suddenly experience them and begin at that point asking questions that should have been answered before taking the drug. This is how brainwashing works.
The best way to define disinformation in this pandemic is anything that disagrees with the official narrative. Notice this includes a simple dissenting opinion. Doctors are losing their licenses for expressing dissenting opinions, a cornerstone of traditional science.
Who designs the official narrative? In the case of American news outlets and social media, it’s the CDC and FDA. These agencies are fully captured by the companies they regulate so clearly they get their narrative from Pharma, Gates, and Dr. Fauci.
CENSORSHIP
In order to mechanize Censorship on social media, companies like FB use “fact checkers” – the term was first used to describe the activities of companies who purported to have the ability to research and discover the true facts of something. Today, these fact-checkers are used to compare statements posted online to official narratives from the CDC and FDA and sometimes the WHO. Since these sources don’t always agree, it is sleight of hand and most likely the case that the most stringent policy will be adopted.
Clearly using these techniques a private company can honor a commitment to a government entity to censor content that disagrees with the government narrative without violating the 1st amendment protecting free speech (until you realize they are acting as an “agent” of the government). At least, “optically” this appears to be what’s happening. But most Americans know that this is just a not-so-clever way of getting around the government’s commitment to the 1st amendment. As soon as Congressman Adam Schiff wrote the first letter to social media companies asking them to censor disinformation, the government officially entered the business of denial of the 1st amendment.
Any social media company that doesn’t play along (like Parler) gets put out of business entirely.
But let’s look at “unintended consequences” which are typically things that are unforeseen by the framers of laws. A noted and highly published and respected scientist has an opinion on something contained in the official narrative and is censored for an article stating perhaps some research and an opinion. So now a highly credible “dissenting opinion” is censored as well. And scientific debate which is the foundation of real science is stopped by censorship.
Certainly, there are some kinds of disinformation that we would like to censor. Opinions based on facts that are “manufactured” and have no clear basis in science. All news content is beset by this phenomenon. People who know that some people will believe news content without checking the sources and facts disseminate information – a different narrative if you will – and seek to influence others to adopt a negative narrative. Of course, you might defend this by saying, “Let the consumer of information beware.” And caution people to be more discerning in how they consume information.
We also have the problem of dissemination through social media of “hate speech” and organizing military action against the U.S. or “insurrection.” That topic is outside this discussion but I acknowledge it exists as another problem driving censorship.
Dr. Anthony Fauci seems to be one of the few people in America who can give an opinion that becomes “narrative” without citing even one scientific study to support this opinion. In fact, the chief science advisor to the president should have the burden of showing thousands of highly credible scientific sources all over the world but he does not. And of course the reason is highly transparent and visible – he has a conflict of interest – he benefits from vaccine sales and has strong relationships with vaccine sellers including Gates Foundation, not to mention a 50-year history of controlling the NIH narrative and business operations that bring billions to the CDC and FDA as well as distribute trillions to his chosen projects.
So can we actually sensor disinformation without stopping scientific debate? Can we encourage healthy dissent – one of the backbones of the American Republic? Or does censorship hold the seeds of dictatorship and fascism? Is censorship a “slippery slope” which once embarked on cannot be stopped until it erases anything against the official narrative?
Does Dr. Fauci’s lack of scientific input and credibility speak loudly enough? I can today, using Zoom or similar technology, place a call and discuss with 1000 scientists the issue of vaccination, lockdown, masks, etc. What would stop Dr. Fauci from doing this in order to formulate a scientific opinion based on the broadest input? Of course, I also know why he doesn’t do that. The over-whelming worldwide scientific opinion is that lockdowns and masks don’t work and are detrimental, that the vaccines should be stopped now, and that our health agencies in the U.S. should be taken to the Hague Tribunal for crimes against humanity. These are not opinions held lightly and these actions are underway at the writing of this article.
CANCEL CULTURE
Another tool in the toolkit of our public health agencies and vaccine advocates/investors is the ability to cancel dissenting opinions. The most used approach is to discredit the authors. Everyone thought the Great Barrington Declaration would stand because you could not discredit its authors – leading scientists from Oxford, Princeton, and Harvard. But much to our surprise, the “machine” that Gates and others have constructed over the past decade mobilizes an impressive number of bloggers, media channels, and social media drivers, who succeeded in cancelling (at least temporarily) the scientific opinions in the paper.
I believe that Gates and others anticipated that this pandemic would attract many dissenting opinions which would need to be cancelled in order to survive.
In addition, a very large number of doctors have been threatened with losing their license and livelihood. Paul Thomas of Oregon lost his license for publishing vaccine data from his pediatric practice. The information was deemed harmful to patients with regard to vaccines but some would argue it was only supporting “informed consent” – a right we have had since the Nazi war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg. His license was just recently re-instated after 10 months with a strong warning. Many others doctors who haven’t received the press that Dr. Paul has had are still waiting for their license to be restored. Clearly a doctor talking about the use of alternatives to vaccines, or treating their patients for COVID is something the public health community was prepared to enforce as they’ve acted uniformly and very quickly across the U.S. In the case of Senator and Dr. Scott Jensen of Minnesota, it’s clear that the visibility turned the medical board the other way on a plan to remove his license.
There are many hospitals across the United States that do not have a treatment for COVID. It is not because treatments do not exist but rather because the CDC and FDA have said their is no recommended treatment and backed that up with action – having doctors removed and even delicensed for trying to treat the patient. Essentially this means the CDC and our U.S. government have taken over the job of the doctors. The doctors may no longer look at a patient, see they have blood clotting, and prescribe and treat the patient with known and effective treatments for that condition. A ventilator to a patient with symptoms of blood clotting in the lungs, inflammation, and pneumonia is a death sentence. There is a financial incentive for hospitals for placing a patient on a ventilator.
Groups like America’s Front Line Doctors “AFLD” have suffered numerous affronts including the early shutdown of their website without notice, shunning by the press on numerous press releases, as methods to “cancel” or “erase” their efforts at educating the public about results derived from their practices and hospital service. Still this group continues to grow, now thousands of doctors worldwide, and in terms of their impact. They have significant resources now and their data about therapeutic drugs such a HCQ and Ivermectin is very convincing and well-supported. There is also now a national network of doctors who will prescribe these protocols so that people who want to gain access to preventive and life-saving treatment can get it.
Of course the ultimate “cancel culture” effort is currently being waged against unvaccinated citizens whereby the president is encouraging those vaccinated to attack those unvaccinated because they are “killing our friends and family”. These kind of messages are picked up by the mainstream media in an echo chamber that incites violence against everyone who even looks like they’re unvaccinated. This hate campaign of course ignores the science that clearly says those who have had COVID are naturally immune and if vaccinated are highly likely to have side effects that could kill them. The Cancel Culture is to erase or otherwise defeat the unvaccinated at any cost. The country may never recover, especially when they learn the truth about the misinformation that drove them to attack their fellowman.
THE END GAME FOR DISINFORMATION
It’s clear that the U.S. will continue to push on censorship via social media and most of section 230 will be neutralized. This will force social media to go “over-kill” on censorship and cancellation which will cause some seriously egregious 1st amendment violations but most specifically for scientists, doctors, researchers, and those doing serious scientific work, it will close down all channels for sharing of information and scientific debate.
It is also clear that the U.S. intends to close down all channels besides social media that currently allow scientific dissent. Unfortunately, unintended consequences are far beyond the shallow thinking that goes into congressional actions. Pharma and Gates have already captured the scientific journals that formerly carried papers that were peer-reviewed and commented by scientists all over the world. These are now useless for the scientific process. These actions will require that the scientific community develop it’s own independent forum for debate as an “underground” function so that Pharma and Gates cannot influence them. But that process will be less visible to the public even though PUBMED would usually carry any published study, it’s clear that Pharma and Gates won’t allow that.
With Pharma and Gates firmly in control of the official narrative, the field will be clear for the continuation of the pandemic and the medical takeover. But this will cause a backlash and strengthen the citizens who are replacing social media and mainstream media with an alternative media channel that will carry and support science and the truth.
What skills are required to become a senator, a president, or vice president? How do those skills relate to the skills required to lead a country?
If we take a snapshot of todays requirements, it would appear that to get elected we need to be able to assess what the people want, become popular with the people by talking about those things, convince the people we’ll do what we say, convince the people that we have years of experience at managing one or more companies successfully, and solving problems. A candidate also needs to demonstrate strong leadership qualities such as decisiveness, a commanding style, a strong reaction to right and wrong, the ability to think under fire, to seek and accept wise advice, debate, negotiate, raise money, and more.
But do the skills needed to win an election guarantee the quality of leadership of a country? What if a leader is misled by carefully-crafted “facts” that pushes him in the wrong direction? What if his or her advisors discover his “hot buttons” and push them to achieve predictable reactions? What if he or she reacts too quickly and doesn’t pay attention to the science gained from thousands of world-leading scientists and not from the biased opinion of one science advisor?
The skills required to lead in today’s complex society are different than what might have been required in times gone by. Today we see leaders that say, “Trust me” and “Why don’t they trust me?” instead of leaders who say, “This is a very hard decision we face. 25,000 have died after vaccination. 20,000 have died after getting a COVID diagnosis and that number is highly suspicious. Vaccines do not prevent spread of COVID. And just as many people are getting COVID after vaccination as without it. Masks don’t work. Natural immunity appears to be a strong protection against infection. So you have to decide. Our recommendation is to get vaccinated but this is your decision. Some of you might get the vaccine and die. Some might get it and avoid COVID. We can’t promise anything. This is an experimental vaccine. I don’t want anyone forcing anyone else to do this. It is your decision.”
Now what happens to trust when a leader tells it like it is using the best uncensored science available?
This is a different skill set. It requires integrity. And it’s a much deeper understanding of what the public is thinking and feeling, and how you can connect with them. Leaders must connect with the people and understand what they’re thinking, not drive and coerce them to act not in their best interest.
Leaders must resist being influenced by fake or expedient science. To be valid, science must be the result of a very strong consensus of scientists world wide. The idea of a single science advisor would never occur to a good leader.
Leaders must understand their role in government. They swear an oath to protect and defend the constitution. The constitution by the people, for the people, and of the people. There is a difference between commanding the people and leading the people. Even when it comes to public health, a leader may advise the public of the truth but cannot force them to adopt a narrative or action based on how they interpret the truth.
It’s confusing…Citizen’s United made us begin to believe we were trying to please corporations because they were now “people” under the constitution but they’re not. They’re entities who can and will spend an enormous amount of money to get their way. They will corrupt congress and thwart climate change ruining the environment to get their way. They will resist new energy sources until the surface temperature in Florida is 150 degrees and then sell air conditioned huts to live in.
We need to realize that our current system of selecting leaders values and promotes the wrong candidates. We are being given choices among Evil or Very Evil to vote for. The election is rigged in that no leaders can make it to the primaries. Only money operates in the current system and only the interests of the elite have influence over our choices for leader. We will never see a president or congressional leaders with the true skills America requires unless we change who we select candidates. This would mean doing away with Citizen’s United, implementing serious election reform, passing a voting rights bill at the federal level that insures a minimum standard for voting laws in every state.
SUMMARY
Most people have never been to a constitutional law class or attended a lecture from a constitutional scholar. Even if you did, you might miss the point of the underlying structure and purpose of the constitution. Some serious thought from our founders went into thinking ahead as to what could go wrong and how to prevent it.
A key tool of the founders was the checks and balances, the division of power, and ways to have one branch of government hold the others accountable. After many years of use and most mis-use, these features have become obscured. In past administrations you might have thought the DOJ (Department of Justice) for instance, works for the President. But the DOJ was conceived as a completely separate entity working for the people to protect against violations of the constitution and laws.
Very simply, the President does not command you. Ours is a government by and for the people. The people were always at the top of the food chain, the states were always representative of the people and superior in all ways to the federal government and the President. The federal government was to adopt the minimum of laws and controls it would take to coordinate the best interests of the states. The “best interests of the states” was to be the will of the people.
Under the constitution, government was put in place to serve the people and protect our god-given rights. These are not privileges but rather they are god-given rights to be protected by government – both state and federal.
The congress should represent the people.
In that understanding, if the people do not march out onto the streets when the federal government tries to control us, it is assumed that any action by the federal government has our agreement. You should think carefully about what Florida and Texas are doing because right now those may be the only examples of a state operating in accordance with the intent of the constitution and the will of the people.
https://www.libertyjustice.info
EVENT 201 – HOW TO GET WORLD LEADERS TO ACT IRRATIONALLY AS AN IMPORTANT PART OF A PLANDEMIC.
MOST PEOPLE KNOW THAT AN EVENT WAS HELD BY THE GATES FOUNDATION AND WEF IN 2019 TO PREPARE WORLD LEADERS AND PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS FOR WHAT WAS TERMED AN INEVITABLE PANDEMIC.
THE TECHNIQUE FOR DOING THIS I NOT WELL-KNOWN TO MOST PEOPLE WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS LIKE SHELL OIL. SINCE THE 1970S, SHELL MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEE HAVE DEVELOPED AND PRACTICED SCENARIO PLANNING – IT’S A WAY TO PREPARE A PARTICULAR VISION OF THE FUTURE AND THEN PRACTICE THE STEPS NECESSARY TO DEAL WITH THAT FUTURE SCENARIO THAT PLACES THE COMPANY AT AN ADVANTAGE BECAUSE IT CAN PREPARE AND ACT VERY QUICKLY IN RESPONSE TO THE SCENARIO.
BY SELECTING THE MOST LIKELY SCENARIOS, A COMPANY LIKE SHELL CAN INVEST TIME AND RESOURCES IN PREPARING FOR A SCENARIO IN ADVANCE AND OFTEN USE SUCH A “CRISIS” DEVELOPMENT TO PULL OUT AHEAD OF COMPETITORS – AS THEY HAVE SINCE 1970.
BUT ONE OF THE ADVANTAGES OF SCENARIO PLANNING IS THAT IT CAN BRING OUT ACTIONS NEEDED AND ESTABLISH THOSE ACTIONS AS ACCEPTABLE WITHOUT NECESSARILY HAVING DONE THE SCIENCE TO ESTABLISH THEIR EFFICACY. MANY ASSUMPTIONS MUST BE MADE EVEN BY THE GREATEST MINDS WITH NO NECESSARY RESOURCES TO CHECK VALIDITY.
WHEN A PLANNING GROUP SUCH AS WAS PRESENT IN EVENT 201, ADDRESSES THE ISSUE OF A COVID PANDEMIC, THEY ARE LIMITED TO THE EXPERTISE IN THE ROOM AND THEREFORE MANY ASSUMPTIONS MUST BE RELIED UPON IN ORDER TO MOVE CONVERSATION FORWARD.
CONCEPTS LIKE DISINFORMATION, LOCKDOWNS, USE OF MASKS, CONDITIONS FOR SPREAD OF THE VIRUS, MUST BE ASSUMED AND OFTEN ARE BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS THAT HAVE NO FACTUAL BASIS.
BUT WHEN A SCENARIO PLANNING SESSION CONCLUDES AT SHELL, ALL ASSUMPTIONS ARE CHECKED AND VALIDATED BY SCIENTISTS AND EXPERTS. WITH EVENT 201, NONE OF THIS OCCURRED AND LEADERS ADJOURNED THINKING THAT THE ACTION ITEMS DISTILLED WOULD PROVIDE VALID GUIDANCE WHEN THE REAL SITUATION (PANDEMIC) CAME ALONG.
ONE OF THE SIGNIFICANT ISSUES RAISED DURING EVENT 201 WAS THE NEED TO CENSOR AND CONTROL SOCIAL MEDIA AS IT WOULD CERTAINLY PLAY A KEY ROLE IN SPREADING MISINFORMATION ABOUT THE FACTS AND THE VACCINES. ALSO DISCUSSED WAS HOW TO USE COMMUNITIES TO FIGHT VACCINE HESITANCY – THIS HESITANCY WAS DISCUSSED AS IF IT WAS NOT BASED ON FACTS OR PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES BUT RATHER SIMPLY THE FEARS OF CONSPIRACY THEORISTS AND VACCINE-INJURED MOTHERS.
IT’S NOT HARD TO SEE HOW THIS EVENT SETUP THE LEADERS BOTH GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE SECTOR WITH BAD ASSUMPTIONS AND MIS-INFORMATION THAT THEY USED IMMEDIATELY WHEN THE REAL PANDEMIC HAD EMERGED.
IN FACT, IT’S NO ACCIDENT THAT THE SINGLE BIGGEST LESSON-LEARNED FROM THE EVENT 201, WAS NOT IMPLEMENTED AND RATHER HINDERED WHEN THE REAL PANDEMIC BEGAN (INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION AND COOPERATION FACILITATED BY CORPORATIONS AND COUNTRY STATES). AS THE W.H.O. PROVED TO BE CORRUPT, AND THE U.N. POWERLESS, ALL THE PLANS DEVELOPED IN EVENT 201 WERE ABANDONED BY DESIGN IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE WORSE POSSIBLE OUTCOME FOR HUMANITY AND THE BEST POSSIBLE OUTCOME FOR BIG PHARMA.
IT’S NO ACCIDENT THAT THE GATES FOUNDATION NOW CONTROLS MAINSTREAM MEDIA VIA BIG PHARMA AND SOCIAL MEDIA CHANNELS. HIS CONTROL OF THE NARRATIVE AND ABILITY TO CANCEL EVEN THE MOST NOTEWORTHY SCIENTISTS (EXAMPLE IS THE GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION) SHOWS THAT MISINFORMATION CONTROLLED BY GATES WAS HANDLED AS A KEY PART OF THE PLANDEMIC.
THE POWER THAT GATES WIELDS CAN BE SEEN BY REVIEWING THIS VIDEO WHICH HAS NEVER SEEN MAINSTREAM MEDIA.
USING MARCH 5 VAERS STATISTICS, ASSUMING ALL DEATHS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS REQUIRED, THE LETHALITY RATE OF COVID-19 VACCINES IS 0.0028%.
CDC STATISTICS PUTS THE DEATH RATE FOLLOWING COVID MRNA VACCINATION AT 0.0024% — SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN THAT FOLLOWING INFLUENZA VACCINATION AT 0.0000265%.
THE PROBLEM
How can we convince people to take a vaccine?
Most people sense or know about the above data. If they don’t know they suspect it because none of this is being shared on mainstream media and the amount of censorship is backfiring on the censors. CDC, NIH, FDA, Gates Foundation (the larger owner of vaccine companies in the world) and Anthony Fauci are all proven to be lying to the public.
So how do we overcome the disadvantage of having people highly suspicious of COVID vaccine misinformation?
Does parading a star athlete or movie star in front of mainstream media taking a vaccine shot work?
Not when the athlete dies a week later and the report about “natural causes” is found to be a coverup because the coroner states no autopsy was performed.
Lying to the public so transparently when they are suspicious anyway is a good way to make things worse.
TELLING THE TRUTH
There is only one way to work with people who are suspicious and don’t trust country or agency leadership. You have to tell the truth…
Face the music – convincing people with cheap tricks and doubling down on lying just won’t work. You have to “face the music” and tell the truth or you have no hope.
The people know the truth when they hear it.
We’re at the point now where there are so many lies that the cities and states are repeating it and putting it out like the DOGMA that it is. And organizations like ICANN are suing each of these cities and states for distribution of lies and false information – and each of these entities – cities and states – and removing their misinformation because they know they will not prevail in court.
The city of Los Angeles closed down 33,000 restaurants according to the Times and then was forced to recant when the restaurant association sued them to show their science. Knowing they had none, they withdrew.
Do we really have to sue a city to force them to tell the truth about lockdowns, masks, and vaccines?
ICANN has also sued the FDA and CDC to force them to state they have no comparative tests proving vaccines are safe and effective. Why would we have to take these agencies to court in order to force them to tell the truth?
There is currently a class action suit staging in Nuremberg that will target governments and vaccine companies among others for falsely creating a pandemic – ARTICLE
REBUILDING TRUST
Do these highly unethical entities like the CDC, FDA, Gates and Fauci really believe they can “convince” people to take a vaccine without trust? Over 20% of people polled recently said they definitely would not take the vaccine.
Do we think we can force people in the name of “herd immunity” to take a vaccine when they don’t trust it or the people providing it? You realize that herd immunity through vaccination has never been scientifically proven? It’s a marketing concept used because it sounds convincing.
How can you bypass trust and expect a population to do what you want?
Fear – you just keep hyping the death numbers to make everyone fearful and willing to do anything. Why continue lockdowns when hospitals are empty? Because it’s much harder to keep the population in fear when they’re not locked down.
CAN TRUST BE BASED ON LIES?
A number of doctors and scientists have come forward and testified (although not carried by the mainstream media) that they have been forced or coerced to code death certificates as COVID even though most are not deaths caused by COVID. The threat of taking away their license has been used to shut them up.
Can we build a trusting relationship by censoring these reports and expecting the public to overlook the “man behind the curtain”?
How could anyone lie and expect people to overlook it? Well for one thing, everyone believes the following:
As long as people lie about these things, why should we trust them?
WHO ARE WE TRUSTING?
When someone says something is “safe and effective” don’t you wonder about who is saying it?
There are basically 4 companies making COVID vaccines. All of them are serial felons. That is, they’ve all been convicted in a court of felonies regarding lies about vaccines, deaths, and they’ve all paid billions in fines and restitution.
The problem is, even when you pay billions in fines, it’s just the cost of doing business to these companies who have been given 100% liability protection and money to develop the vaccines.
Why would you trust these people?
SO ONCE AGAIN – HOW DO YOU TACKLE VACCINE HESITANCY?
If anyone is going to lose their hesitancy, clearly it will be after those speaking have demonstrated they can tell the truth and be trusted. Don’t hold your breath.
THE INFORMATION FOR THIS ARTICLE COMES MOSTLY FROM THE 6-10 HOURS PER DAY I SPEND LISTENING TO INTERVIEWS OF THE WORLD’S LEADING SCIENTISTS ON YOUTUBE AND OTHER MEDIA AND READING BOOKS AND ARTICLES ON THE SUBJECT.
BUT A PART OF MY KNOWLEDGE COMES FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. I’M 75 AND IN DECEMBER I HAD A ROUND WITH COVID-19 FOR 3-4 DAYS. WE KNEW IT WAS SOMETHING DIFFERENT. MY WIFE HAD IT FIRST AND THEN I HAD IT RIGHT AFTER – SO WE KNEW IT WAS HIGHY INFECTIOUS BUT WE ALSO KNEW RIGHT AWAY IT WAS LIKE NO OTHER FLU – THE DRY COUGH, HEAVY CHEST CONGESTION, FEVER, UPSET STOMACH – CLASSIC VIRUS SYMPTOMS BUT NOT LIKE THE REGULAR FLU.
AS A PERSON YOU ARE MOSTLY ALIEN – THAT IS, YOU ARE A HUGE WAREHOUSE FOR BACTERIA, FUNGI, AND VIRUS’ THAT ARE NATURAL AND LIVE IN YOUR GUT, YOUR SKIN, YOUR ORGANS, AND THEY HAVE THEIR OWN DNA (NOT YOURS THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT YOU AND “ALIEN”) THESE ARE GENERALLY CALLED YOUR MICROBIOME AND THEY COMPRISE THE LARGER PORTION OF WHAT CONTROLS AND ACTIVATES YOUR BODY, YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM, YOUR HORMONES, AND EVERYTHING ABOUT HOW YOUR BODY WORKS. THEY INTERACT WITH YOUR DNA WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO HELP YOU PRODUCE NEW CELLS AND FIX DAMAGED ONES.
AVOIDING COVID-19 AND THE FLU
SUPPLEMENTS
RISKS
ADVICE FROM THE EXPERTS
Your comments and questions are welcome.
BASIC CHOICES WE MAKE
There are fundamental choices we make, usually without realizing we’re making them. These choices greatly affect our longer term susceptibility and options downstream as well as our longevity in a healthy body. Pharmaceuticals can help you with longevity in an unhealthy body but mostly we would prefer longevity in a healthy body.
For instance, we can choose to wait until we get an illness and then act – use medications to reduce the symptoms like nasal spray, cold pills, etc.
We can seek to prepare for illness like taking a flu shot thinking that this will prepare us in advance to fight off the flu virus.
Many of these choices allow us to avoid learning in more depth how our body works and how prepared we are to naturally avoid illness.
One choice we make without knowing it is the choice to believe that the body must get ill in the first place. We accept the word and believe the advertising of companies who are interested in selling us medications, shots, and other products on a continuous “womb to tomb” basis. These companies pay for writers who write articles that support certain views that drug manufacturing companies use to support sales of products. They pay doctors to say things like “doctor recommended.” Don’t you think its odd that there are doctors who recommend almost anything?
It’s easy to believe that illness is a natural part of being human because we’re surrounded by choices that damage and depress our immune system. For instance, every time we eat factory-farmed beef in a hamburger we ingest a little bit of antibiotic that was used to prevent the animal from getting an illness because of the conditions at the factory farm including what they feed the animal. These antibiotics are a part of what has lead to our antibiotic crisis where most people do not respond to any antibiotic which they really need it. Meanwhile antibiotics in general always kill off good gut bacteria leading to digestive issues and depressed immune systems.
And every time we take a medication like a flu shot or antibiotic, the resultant killing off of our gut bacteria damages our immune system which is located in our gut and activated by our good gut bacteria.
Eating dairy products from cows used in factory farming also damages our immune system. And eating grains grown in fields using Roundup or Glyphosate, the strongest antibiotic in the world, can reduce our immune system to nothing which is why many people develop symptoms telling them that their gut and immune system are malfunctioning – skin problems, joint problems, headaches, weight problems, food craving problems, brain fog, and more.
Doesn’t it seem odd that all the “science” that has produced newer farming methods (GMOs, etc.) and newer methods for raising farm animals (factory farming) have not produced any impact studies or scientific information about the effects of these methods on humans?
Over half the antibiotics sold in the US every year are sold to dairies and ranches for us on food animals.
In addition, most crops in the US for corn, soy, wheat, and other grains are used for factory farms – that’s correct if you surmised that we spray these crops once or even twice with glyphosate and then feed them to our food animals and then they end up back on our plate or in our glass as the world’s most powerful antibiotic.
And all that might not make sense unless you knew that the same companies who do that are the ones who are also selling us drugs to combat the many symptoms and diseases caused by our food.
THINKING DEFENSIVELY
I would like my immune system to be ready. I want to be able to repel everything that comes my way. The immune system relies on a healthy gut bacterial environment. I can build that up by doing certain things and avoiding others.
LEARN TO RECOGNIZE SYMPTOMS
Learn to recognize when something you’re eating and getting from your environment is affecting you.
The skin – the largest organ in the body and most of us think that it “misbehaves” all by itself without provocation. And that’s almost never true. The skin is just our signaling system for when we are reacting to something that we are mildly and severely allergic to.
Inflammation is a normal bodily immune system reaction that occurs when we cut ourselves or injure ourselves. An arm or leg get bruised, inflammation is the response as the immune system produces more elements to help the body fight off the infection or condition causing pain or discomfort. This reaction is normally fairly short and certainly doesn’t occur over long periods of time unless something is wrong.
If inflammation does continue, it is usually because the body is reacting to continuing doses of something it recognizes as not friendly and sometimes that’s in our food.
Some of the symptoms we can use to recognize inflammation besides skin issues are joint pain including finger, toes, or knees and elbows. Stiff muscles in back or limbs can also be a sign. Sometimes when back muscles tighten up and we move around it causes bones to be moved out of places which results in more pain and almost seems to point to bones as being the root causes of the pains when really the initial cause was inflammation caused by a food allergy.
Headaches often go along with other symptoms.
As the immune system is mainly based in the gut, you could easily expect that gut issues including pain, diarrhea, constipation, heart burn, indigestion, gas and bloating, and more were first and foremost indicators of inflammation.
Examples of food allergies where we are mildly but not seriously allergic (in most cases this is the real cause) are wheat and other grains – many people have a mild to allergic reaction to these – as well as dairy products – most people also have mild to more severe reactions – and off course anything refined which is especially true of sugar from any source.
Almost everyone on the planet has some level of inflammatory reaction to sugar and we have just learned to “live with it” but make no mistake, the human body which was designed a very long time ago and has changed very little, was not designed to ingest sugar and carbohydrates. Making the major part of our diet about these invites constant and ongoing inflammation.
None of these symptoms are normal and none are necessary. And none go without long term consequences whether you’re currently young or old.
TALKING TO PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC DISEASE
The upshot of inflammation is a general category called “Chronic Disease” – this encompasses everything that isn’t the result of a traumatic accident or a virus. Although the early symptoms of chronic inflammation were described above, the later symptoms are diabetes, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimers, Multiple Sclerosis, cancer, fiber myalgia, obesity, and about 200+ more.
Not all chronic disease comes from food of course. But more generally we could say that most come from “environmental factors” – that is, things we eat, are exposed to, use on our hands or body, or breath in – so “environmental” is everything.
What is it like to speak to someone who has and is committed to chronic disease?
“We’ve done some testing and we believe that dairy products are the source of your inflammation and obesity – we notice your skin is always red and somewhat swollen.”
“Does that include ice cream?”
“Well yes, anything that comes from a cow or a dairy – anything made with milk.”
“OK well I just don’t know if I can do that. I eat a lot everyday and in the past with other diets I’ve cut out 2-3 meals and still not lost weight. So I don’t see how not eating ice cream is going to help.”
“Take a look at this case study of a woman about your same age who had an allergy to dairy products. She quit eating any dairy for 3 weeks and lost 40lbs with no other dietary changes.”
“I’ve seen a lot of studies like that before. It seems like they always worked for that person but not for me.”
People who are obese have beliefs that were created by doctors and other experts who re-enforced that obesity requires that you eat less and exercise more. An entire diet industry is built around this idea and many of the “challenges” require exercise and dieting in outrageous proportions.
So regardless of the symptoms, we find that there is a mental element to the issue of chronic disease – many times the person has had the condition for so long that they have decided the cause and what won’t work already and they are committed to that belief.
To say to a patient, “just stop eating dairy products” is just a bigger gap than it appears. Many people belief in their condition and its permanence. It can’t be as easy as stopping eating dairy, or wheat, or something else. It just can’t be that easy. Someone would have told me that before now. And besides, I love ice cream.
So the mental state required is a commitment that, “I will do whatever it takes to find the cause of this problem.” It’s a mental state that agrees to look anew at possible scientific explanations with more dignity. Our bodies only fo things because we are out of balance and we can find that balance by finding the source of inflammation. Sometimes those conditions are more permanent but often they are not. Looking for the cause of inflammation is often fruitful because it opens a new avenue for investigation.
And often the body gives us feedback almost immediately – a reduction in skin conditions, a lessening of indigestion, a reduction in joint pain – sometimes just small subtle changes can tell us we’re on the right road.
SUMMARY
The symptoms of inflammation are not random – they follow a pattern because the body generates inflammation for a reason. Look for that pattern and the root causes and you’re on the right track.
Have you ever thought about the natural laws that underpin our world? Governed by sacred geometry, organic patterns are the building blocks that shape our experiences. They show up again and again, begging to be recognized, understood, and utilized for the benefit of mankind.
THINGS HAVE CHANGED
If you’re approaching or just passing 40, this is the ideal time to read this article carefully.
What’s changed? Everything. When your mother and father referred to someone they knew who was “strong as a horse” they were generally referring to someone who never got sick, or if they did, they recovered very quickly. And injuries rarely slowed these “strong as a horse” people down. Their bodily constitution was good – a strong immune system that would fight off anything, including cancer, and could repair injuries fast.
But now we see very few “strong as a horse” people.
So what changed?
Food production – our farms have been forced into “mono crops” – a single product like corn, soybeans, wheat, and grown all year long. And GMOs have been introduced using patented seeds with anti-weed and anti-insect technology embedded into the seed. The GMO seeds are also Roundup or Glyphosate resistant so you can spray them continually and in theory not damage the plant. As we use these new seeds and sprays, we damage the soil and reduce its ability to bring nutrients to the plants. Every year the soil loses its natural bacteria that bring nutrients to the plant and the soil gets harder witness the amount of tillage (plowing up the soil) required. When the natural bugs and bacteria are in the healthy soil, you don’t “till” because that would kill the soil, but when you have killed off all the healthy bacteria, you have no choice but to till and farmers say that after 10 years it requires a new tractor that is 3X as heavy in order to be able to cut the soil deep enough to turn it over. And altogether, this new process produces less bushels per acre than the old methods because the soil is ruined and the crops are not rotated so insects are a much bigger problem than ever in the past. Science created by people who either don’t understand or don’t care about the future, has ruined our best farming lands and now because these companies must make a profit, they simply want to add more and more chemicals to fix the problem. Do you see how doing the same thing that caused the problem will only make it even worse?
You have to ask – why are the farms empty of birds, empty of bees, empty of all the normal insects and animals that used to inhabit these fields? Why do the cows and other animals get sick from eating these crops?
Has our food production changed?
Animal Products – production of ranch animals including cows, pigs, lamb, chickens, and bison has moved mainly from open grazing land to CAFOs (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations) or just Factory Farms. These farms pack animals close together feeding them from troughs while they stand knee deep in their own feces. Animals are fed not with the grass plants they were naturally and genetically grown to digest but with GMO corn, soy, and products that cause poor digestion and disease. Then animals are automatically dosed with antibiotics to counteract the diseases caused by the feed and their filthy environment as well as the knowledge that animals will gain weight more quickly with antibiotics – CAFOs are the biggest users of antibiotics in the world. Do you believe those antibiotics dissipate when it gets to your table? Do you thinking cooking kills it?
Given these changes in production methods, we have meat that is contaminated with GMOs, Glyphosate and other chemicals which are potentially worse, diseased and dying, and has a fraction of the nutrients given the depletion of the food supply, the lack of digestion of food products these animals shouldn’t eat. Our animal products used to contribute massive amount of Omega 3 to our diet. Now they contribute almost none at all.
Has our meat production changed?
Dairy Products – just as CAFOs have changed our meat production, so have they also been employed in our dairy production. Separate from the obvious contamination of all our dairy products, we also have the question of whether cows were made to give milk for anything other than baby cows? Many scientists would argue the answer is “no” based on extensive science.
But has our dairy production changed?
Environmental Toxins – our environment has changed dramatically in the past 30 years. Our rivers, streams, and ground water are contaminated with Glyphosate and other water soluble toxins that we’ve been spraying. The runoff is contaminating our ocean fish as everyone knows. We also have climate modification activities that have resulted in heavy metals like aluminum – we have independent studies where researchers have sampled ice in remote areas untouched by civilization such as Greenland, Arctic, and Iceland and found heavy metals on the outer layer of ice suggesting it is falling from the air all over the planet. We have gardeners spraying Roundup on apartment and association landscapes where we track that into our homes on the bottoms of our shoes and leave it in our carpet. We have mold growing in home air conditioners and in walls. We have an increasing number of vaccinations with mercury and aluminum adjuvants – perhaps 35 by age 18 months. We also have fluoride which has now been proven to have no affect on tooth health and serious and toxic effects on gut bacteria and our immune system. We collect various forms of plastic in our gut and these act as hormone disrupters. We believe plastics are benign but they’re far from it. We believe that cosmetics and personal hygiene items are benign, but they aren’t. We believe having 50 ingredients in soap and shampoo is good but it isn’t.
Has our use of toxic chemical pollutants and chemicals changed?
Electro Magnetic Fields “EMF” – we have increased our exposure to electromagnetic fields. Most people would intuitively understand that exposure to microwaves is not a good idea but our environment is being systematically filled with low-level microwave and we have no idea how much we’re actually exposed to. There is a growing body of evidence and science that EMF – coming from WIFI stations, cell phones, wireless devices of all kinds, the new digital meters installed by the electric companies without our permission, neighborhood transmitters and receivers for television, appliances, our watches, and a hundred other sources are cumulatively increasing our load beyond measure – are harmful to our mitochondria – the energy production center for our cells. And we’re about to “nuke” our planet with 5G – a technology being pushed forward with no human safety studies at all – not one funded by government or industry. And this 5G technology is going to show up from 10 or more transmitters in your home via appliances, multiple satellites above you, buildings and stores and retail areas you visit, and much more. Our exposure without knowing anything about the risk to our health will be conservatively 100 times the exposure we have today.
WE’RE NOT GETTING HEALTHIER – WHAT’S THE EVIDENCE?
If we look at our population, what does it tell us about the effects of these things that we discussed above? Is there evidence that these changes are having an effect?
Chronic Disease – non-communicable diseases, the ones you don’t catch from others – are things like heart disease, obesity, diabetes, cancer, multi-sclerosis, Parkinson’s, autism spectrum, auto-immune, thyroid failure, acute depression, and much more.
At the turn of the century these were largely unheard of and today over 50% of the population suffers from one or more chronic diseases, many undiagnosed. If the growth in chronic disease continues at its current rate, there are many scientists who warn we will bankrupt our healthcare system inside 20 years, that is, provided we still have healthcare for all and don’t do away with it in the next year.
Not only are these chronic diseases increasing, but even more alarming they are showing up at younger and younger ages. That’s what I’m saying – cancer, diabetes, heart failure, auto-immune, and AUTISM – big time – are all showing up in the teens or earlier in significant numbers.
If you wanted to reduce the earth’s population, you would not have to look for a way. The population of most developed countries has declined every year for the past 20 years. Fertility among both male and female has declined almost 50%.
Some might argue that some form of auto-immunity is at the root of almost every chronic disease we see. Auto-immunity is a condition where the body perceives enemies that activate the immune system constantly causing chronic inflammation which results in the body attacking itself. This can show up as any number of problems depending on genetics and which body system is the most susceptible. Some people will have inflammation show up in their thyroid, and some will show up in their skin. In some it will show up as acute sensitivity to certain foods or environmental factors. Some will have acute allergic reactions to medications they’re being given for another condition.
Auto-immunity and inflammation are the effects not the real root causes. The cause for most people is “leaky gut” a condition where the micro-biome or the gut bacteria are damaged by heavy metals, glyphosate, other environmental toxins, or bad foods. When a person has leaky gut, the protein from foods and toxins they digest, move freely into the blood stream bypassing the natural barriers built into a normally functioning gut and once in the blood stream they activate the immune system and cause attacks on good tissue throughout the body including the brain.
Aging – we’re not aging well. Sure medicine may have added years to some people’s lives, but make no mistake the quality of those years – on medications with tons of side-effects, walking with a walker, disabled, suffering from dementia – this is not a longer life that you want. And the scientific measures of longevity, the measure of DNA strands called “Telomeres” tell us the actual physical age of the body and as you might guess, most people are a lot older than their years.
We have a population that is highly dependent on a medical system designed to provide urgent care. Traditional medicine forms a diagnosis and then prescribes drugs to treat the illness. As we can keep people alive longer, they become consumers of more drugs. Good for the drug company – not so much for us.
And chronic diseases are gold mines for the pharmaceutical companies. The cost of drugs has increased 4X in the past 10 years and the number of drugs available to treat symptoms for chronic diseases is increasing – just watch television in the evening to see that for yourself.
Big Pharma has no interest whatsoever in solving any of these problems and to be honest, they couldn’t solve this problem with drugs anyway – because the solution to aging is to limit what you take – limit what you ingest – get less bad stuff and give your body time to recover. A drug that was truly for aging would most likely cause something else even worse.
When Bill Gates announced he would fund research he framed it as developing a drug to address a particular condition. That speaks for itself – if you can’t fund research without a commercial outcome how can you ever get to the real root cause and solution?
Alzheimers – we don’t really have to quote facts about the increase in Alzheimers. The epidemic is so vast and so pronounced that almost everyone has touched it with their parents, the friends parents, and more. It’s pretty hard to ignore that Alzheimer’s is in the future for one out of two seniors.
Autism – 40 years ago the number of childhood cases of autism of any kind was well under one in 100,000. Today we’re getting ready to pass 1 in 40. The national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System – VAERS – only captures 1% of all injuries caused by vaccination. Still the incidence of adverse events on the autism spectrum are growing and the vaccine court that hears cases for vaccine injuries has awarded over $4B on cases of vaccine injuries. Although nobody wants to admit it, the absence of safety studies in the world of vaccines makes this area highly suspect at least as a contributing factor.
WHAT DO WE NEED TO KNOW TO SURVIVE?
Most of the best solutions are tied to our food. Sure we’re exposed to things in our environment but the human body is designed to eliminate most toxins and cure most disease if it isn’t overloaded by to many bad things.
So what we can do right away is learn to recognize things that are harmful and avoid them whenever possible.
Consider CANCER. The human body has cancer cells. They’re cells that grow in almost every body. Your immune system normally keeps them in check. Normally cancer cells can get a hold in the body because they’re killed by the immune system and detoxed (think “take out the trash”) that night. If your immune system is functioning the way it should and your detox systems aren’t too clogged up, then you’ll be able to hold your own against cancer and many of the other chronic diseases. But inflammation is what gets cancer started – it puts the body out of balance and disables the immune system so that cancer can get out of control.
Obesity, which is a chronic disease, and diabetes which goes right along with it, are mainly caused by inflammation.
So best to look at things that cause inflammation and study how to slow those down.
The immune system creates inflammation whenever it detects that there are invaders in the body. Inflammation is a temporary tool that the immune system uses to combat things that shouldn’t be there.
So what foods inflame your body?
GMOs – Genetically Modified Organisms have been proven in scientific studies and in clinical practice to inflame the gut and thus create a variety of symptoms. Avoiding GMOs is just a smart thing to do and if you avoid corn, soy, and wheat that have not been grown organically, you’ll eliminate the bulk of GMOs from your diet. Looking at package labelling will help you avoid more.
Lectins – lectins are proteins that form on various vegetable and produce products that are thought to be formed to protect the plant. In real life, people can be more or less sensitive to them but generally when eaten they bind with carbohydrates in the gut and play negative roles causing inflammation. One of the most notorious lectins is gluten. Found in grains such as wheat, some people are mildly or even strongly allergic to this lectin which generally causes inflammation.
Glyphosate – one thing you can count on is if you eat grains such as corn, wheat, soy, or any crop that is not organically grown, you’re going to be ingesting Glyphosate. Not only is it used to spray crops during growing, it is used to desiccate (dry out) crops once they are harvested. If you eat bread, or cereal, or any product made from or around these grains you’re going to get a steady dose of this and other pesticide/herbicides and these are the most deadly antibiotics on the planet. The guy who originally discovered Glyphosate put it on the shelf for fear that in using it he might cause the destruction of the planet. Unfortunately for us, Glyphosate is water soluble and therefore it can go anywhere and everywhere water goes – it is found in minute quantities in mother’s milk. It’s effect is to kill gut bacteria and cause massive inflammation in the gut which leads to leaky gut and that leads to even bigger issues.
Sugar – the best way I’ve seen to make this point is to point out what happens to any plant when it is super refined. What happens to a poppy? Sugar is a super-refined form of sugar beets or sugar cane – it’s in a form that was not intended to be ingested by humans. Its impact is immediate and sustained inflammation. As it is used in almost every packaged food known to man, it therefore puts packaged foods pretty much off limits. And that puts sodas with sugar and juices like orange juice off limits as well. Many people have gotten cancer under control just by eliminating sugar from their diets. But before we leave the subject, let’s realize that certain types of foods turn to sugar faster and in larger quantities than sugar. As soon as you place a slice of white bread or a mouthful of white potato into your mouth, your saliva goes to work converting that to sugar so quickly (glycemic index tells you which foods do this) that it might as well be sugar itself.
Dairy – the question keeps returning – do cows make milk for people or for calves (baby cows)? Most people are mildly allergic to dairy. Milk is really just cow puss that’s been homogenized and because of the rules around dairy they don’t have to tell you about the other contents – hormones, antibiotics, and more. Now if you’re committed to drinking your share of cow puss, the best on the planet if A2 milk, which is milk that’s been derived from certain types of cows that produce a very different type of milk that is much more digestible and of course organically produced so we don’t get the other ingredients that nobody talks about. If you can’t digest it then that will cause inflammation.
Meat – a number of very large scientific studies have already proven that people live longer when they don’t eat meat. It has also been proven without a doubt that meat eaters have a much higher cancer rate. All of the information about how much protein you need to stay healthy was manufactured by people who sell meat. It was never a scientific fact. If you listen to Tony Robbins very long – a vegetarian – he’ll tell you that a good diet of raw whole vegetables will provide all the protein a human needs. Once again we bought the massive misinformation campaign around meat. Just think about the media hype that sold us “corn fed beef” as being the best thing we ever ate. Remember that cows don’t eat corn at all – they’re not designed to eat corn or grains and they get sick and even die when they eat it. So who sold us on the idea that beef would be better if corn fed? Why does meat have such an impact on humans? It causes inflammation.
Yes if you eat only pasture-raised beef, chicken, and pork, it will be healthier than eating the alternative. But those producers are also misleading you about meat or they’ve grown up in a society who bought into the big lie and they’ve never known that eating meat was a big part of their problems.
Looking at the list, it probably seems like there’s nothing really safe to eat. The truth is, I’m not sure anyone ever actually does this 100%. The truth is that if you eliminate even a part of these your health will improve and your longevity will increase. If you slowly find a way to just eliminate packaged foods, your health will improve. If you find a way to eliminate sugar, and things that turn to sugar immediately, your health will improve.
Socrates said “Let food be thy medicine” – the truth is that bad food can kill you over a long period but good food can make you healthy a lot quicker.
Dr. Gerson became famous for curing cancer patients in a clinical setting. Sometimes you just have to leap over all the traditional medical cures – chemo, radiation, surgery – and do something you know is better for the patient. These traditional cures don’t cure cancer even though they have manipulated the data to say they do, if you look longer term, after the 6-12 months of most studies, you realize it’s just a scam – a multi-billion dollar scam but a scam. Susan B. Coman has raised billions to cure cancer and in all those years not one breakthrough has resulted – it’s just a much higher price for chemo, radiation, and surgery.
So Dr. Gersen said “Cancer is an inflammatory disease and the immune system isn’t doing it’s job” and he prescribed very healthy vitamin and enzyme-packed green drinks 3 times a day along with coffee enemas to get the detox system going and his patients not only got better but they experienced complete remissions in many cases. Does a cure have to be 100% to be valid? If so, then traditional cancer treatment fails that as well.
GETTING ON THE PATH
So you might feel there are many things listed that you just can’t do. That’s fine. Pick the ones you can and start there. Once you feel better, you have more mental clarity (one of the symptoms of inflammation is brain fog) you might decide to do more.
One of the things I can recommend to start is RESTORE
This can directly address the leaky gut with 2-3 tablespoons a day.
There are other supplements I’ll recommend in a future post. Once you’re firmly on the path, the supplements will help you get the nutrition from a new diet.
from
THIS IS REALLY ODD. CANCER IS THE IMBALANCE IN THE BODY BETWEEN PROCESSES THAT CAN CREATE ABNORMAL GROWTH CELLS.
THE IMBALANCE COMES WHEN YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM IS DEPRESSED AND CAN’T ELIMINATE CANCER CELLS. YOU HAVE CANCER CELLS PRESENT ALL THE TIME BUT YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM “TAKES OUT THE TRASH” WHEN IT IS FUNCTIONING NORMALLY.
BUT WHAT CAUSES YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM TO NOT FUNCTION NORMALLY?
SO NOW THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES WANT TO INVEST A VACCINE TO SUPPORT YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM TO FIGHT CANCER. THAT’S JUST CRAZY.
WHY DON’T YOU JUST STOP KILLING YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM, LET IT COME BACK TO NORMAL, AND PROTECT YOU FROM CANCER IN THE FIRST PLACE?
AND WHY WOULD YOU USE A VACCINE WHICH WOULD HAVE MERCURY OR ALUMINUM TO ENHANCE YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM? THAT’S JUST CRAZY.
Given what we are now exposed to through our food, air, and water, detoxification has become a modern-day necessity. Without the daily activation of ancient, effective physiological pathways designed to remove naturally occurring environmental and toxins or manmade chemical toxicants, we are bound to get sick.
